Quality Assurance Perspective on Microservices

Publish Date:  

QA Perspective On Microservices

Share This Post

Last updated on April 4th, 2024

Software testing pros know that quality assurance (QA) in microservices architecture needs a totally different approach as compared to monolithic application architecture. Although microservices architecture enables complex applications to be developed rapidly and reliably, the existing QA strategies do not always apply. Each microservice needs to be developed and delivered according to its own schedule, and this is a major reason why QA is more complicated in microservices.

In this article, let’s discuss the QA perspective on microservices. But first, let’s first understand a bit more about microservices (for those who need that essential background!). 

What are Microservices?

Microservices or microservice architecture is an architectural approach to building applications where a single application is built by using a set of small services. Each small service (also known as a function) runs its own process and is loosely coupled so that one team’s changes won’t affect the entire app.

As opposed to a monolithic approach, each service can be built and deployed independently. This enables individual services to function and fail without negatively affecting other services. These small services are –

  • Highly maintainable and testable

  • Coupled loosely

  • Independently deployable

  • Organized around business capabilities

  • Owned by a small team

In a nutshell, microservices architecture is an ideal way to build apps for DevOps and CI/CD. Its adoption is quite impressive as well.

As per a survey by O’Reilly, microservices adoption is quite mature. About 61% of the survey respondents said that they’ve been using microservices for a year or more while for 28% of the respondents, it was three years or more.

Quality Assurance in Microservices

QA and software testing in microservices requires a different approach since the testing team needs to begin testing microservices in the design phase itself. 

In a microservices architecture, there is more reliance on over-the-wire (or remote) dependencies than on in-process components. So, the QA strategy needs to be adapted accordingly.

While conducting microservices QA, one must keep the following three things in mind –

  • The code should do what it is supposed to be doing.

  • When it comes to sharing feedback, be quick and reliable in sharing it.

  • The overall maintenance should be made easier.

Types of Testing Strategies for Microservices

Let’s now take a quick look at various testing strategies for microservices. 

Unit testing

It is important to validate each microservice separately. Unit testing involves keeping the test units as small as possible so as to reduce the branching complexity of the unit. Unit testing when combined with test-driven development (TDD) makes it a powerful tool. Unit testing can be done in two subgroups –

  • Sociable unit testing involves testing the behavior of the module by observing changes in their state.

  • Solitary unit testing observes the interactions and collaborations between objects and their dependencies.

But unit testing doesn’t completely fit the bill since its complexity increases with the decrease in service size.

Integration testing

An integration test exercises communication paths through the subsystem to find any incorrect assumptions that each module might have about interacting with its peers.

Integration testing helps verify the communication path and interactions between the components so as to detect interface defects. It is done by collecting microservices together and verifying whether they collaborate as intended to achieve a bigger business logic. It also helps test the communication path through a subsystem for checking any incorrect assumptions about each microservice.

In integration testing, it’s important to remember the end goal which is to aim for basic success and error paths through the integration module.

Component testing

After executing unit tests, the next step is to test the microservice or the component itself. A component is an independent and well-defined part of a larger system.

Component tests are implemented in isolation and within each microservice’s code repository. Since a typical application will have numerous microservices, so to test a single microservice/component in isolation, we need to mock other microservices. This sort of isolation testing using test doubles helps avoid any complex behavior they might exert in execution.

Simply put, a major benefit of component testing is that it allows you to test microservices in isolation. This makes it easier, quicker, cheaper, and more reliable. But a drawback of component testing is that the microservice may pass the test in isolation, but the final application may fail in production.

Contract testing

When a consumer couples to the interface of a component to make use of its behavior, a contract is formed. The component, in this case, is the microservice and the interface is the API exposed by a service.

Through a contract, a consumer and component exchange input and output data structures, performance, and concurrency characteristics. In contract testing, we write an independent test suit to verify individual contracts.

End-to-end testing

In end-to-end testing, the intention is to verify that the system as a whole meets the business goals. The focus is less on the component architecture and more on the end result.

While writing an end-to-end test suite, it’s better to follow some basic guidelines like writing as few end-to-end tests as possible, focusing on personas and user journeys, relying on infrastructure as code for repeatability, and making test data independent.

Performance testing

These strategies tend to be more complex than other testing strategies simply because of the high number of supporting resources and moving parts involved. Performance testing should help you determine how an application performs in different situations by finding bottlenecks as usage scales.

Benefits of Quality Assurance in Microservices

Quality Assurance (QA) plays a crucial role in ensuring the success and reliability of microservices.

Here are some benefits of QA in microservices:

Improved Service Quality:

QA activities help identify and eliminate defects, bugs, and inconsistencies in microservices. Thorough testing ensures that each service functions correctly and meets the expected quality standards. This results in higher service quality and customer satisfaction.

Enhanced System Stability:

By conducting comprehensive testing, QA teams can identify and address issues related to service interactions, dependencies, and data consistency. This leads to a more stable and reliable system, reducing the chances of failures and disruptions.

Early Issue Detection:

QA activities, such as unit testing and integration testing, enable early detection of issues and defects in microservices. By identifying problems in the development phase, QA teams can provide feedback to developers, allowing them to address issues promptly and prevent them from escalating further.

Faster Time-to-Market:

Effective QA practices contribute to faster time-to-market for microservices. By ensuring that services are thoroughly tested and validated, QA teams reduce the likelihood of post-deployment issues, minimizing the need for rework and accelerating the overall development and release cycles.

Increased Scalability and Resilience:

QA testing includes evaluating the scalability and resilience of microservices. By simulating high loads, stress testing, and failure scenarios, QA teams can identify performance bottlenecks and weaknesses. This enables the optimization of services to handle varying workloads and enhances the overall system’s scalability and resilience.

Risk Mitigation:

QA activities help mitigate risks associated with microservices. By implementing security testing, vulnerability assessments, and risk analysis, QA teams can identify and address potential security threats, reducing the likelihood of data breaches, unauthorized access, and other security-related issues.

Conclusion

These days companies like Spotify, Netflix, Amazon, Uber, etc. have moved to microservice architecture. As adoption grows, QA becomes crucial for organizations to derive the full value from microservices. Ultimately, microservices will drive an overhaul of your application but that will only happen once you revamp your approach to QA and software testing.

Looking to revamp your QA approach for microservices? Our team of experts is ready to help you smoothly transition to this new architecture. Contact us today to learn more about our comprehensive QA services and ensure the success of your microservices implementation.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

You may like to read this

Boosting API Gateways with Predictive AI

Boosting API Gateways with Predictive AI

Last updated on May 23rd, 2024 Have you considered the crucial role API gateways play in your digital ecosystem? Beyond routing API requests, they’re vital for seamless service delivery and enhancing user experiences. Yet, many…
AWS Lambda PowerTools

Cut Costs with AWS Lambda PowerTools

Last updated on May 16th, 2024 Have you ever wondered how to supercharge your AWS Lambda functions for better performance and cost-efficiency?  AWS Lambda stands as a pivotal service that lets developers run code without…
AWS Automation Tools for Disaster Recovery

AWS Automation Tools for Disaster Recovery

Last updated on May 14th, 2024 Did you know that a whopping 93% of companies without a disaster recovery plan who suffer a major data disaster are out of business within one year?  Now, let’s…
Scroll to Top